The Pointlessness of Rejecting Christmas
Christmas was always about the excess. It was never about religion.
— Xenocrates

While talking with an atheist recently, he shared something with me that I thought was rather profound. He suggested that even though he doesn’t believe in God, he still goes to church, he still continues to search for Easter Eggs, and even puts up a Christmas tree. I found this to be perplexing given his convictions. So I asked him how he could reconcile this given his unbelief. He said, quite frankly, that mythology was never originally intended for what we now use it for. It is today’s religious zealots who would have us believe otherwise.
That blew my mind. Here’s why:
No Christmas, Ergo, No Religion
For many years I used to attend church with my parents up to my late teens. I was always that annoying kid who knew too much that the church elders would have liked to hear less from about their pagan rituals whenever that time of year came around. I was always very vocal about rejecting Christmas. So my propaganda campaign was thoroughly mapped out.
But even from the age of sixteen, what I really wanted to ask (which nobody had an answer for) was what the implications of rejecting Christmas would be. Christmas has quite literally everything to do with the birth of Christ, and by proxy the birth of Christianity. So this had become a serious problem because Christmas and Christianity were clearly inextricably linked.
So if there was no Christmas, then there would be no Christianity. Christmas and Christianity are Siamese twins if you will, bound at the hip. If you debunk Christmas, you’re half way to completely invalidating the single most popular religion on earth. Christianity is a religious cult that was born in pagan worship. So Christians follow very similar old inherited pagan rituals.
Now when you examine how Christianity came about, you’ll realize that Christmas was instrumental not only to its survival, but to that of the Roman Empire, which at the time, was on the verge of implosion due to civil war from competing pagan religions. The fusion of these religions essentially created Christianity and Christmas and Easter and all the other trappings.
Over two millennia later, most people who practice the pagan faith have all but completely forgotten why they do what they do, and like mindless automatons, put up Christmas trees, lights and effigies of the nativity scene in Church yards while exchanging gifts – completely oblivious to the original point of it all. (See my friend’s blog post on the subject for more info).
The Grinch Explains Himself
Now if you think this is the rambling of some cold hearted Grinch, I ask you to pause just one second and consider this: We all know that Christmas is a farce so there’s no point to stating the obvious. More importantly, there’s even lesser point in rejecting it. This is something I failed to understand for a long time, since I was only caught up in the whole theology of it all.
What I failed to realize all this time, is that the reason why nobody could answer these tough questions of mine, was because they either all knew it was just mythology (or more likely) they didn’t know why. Therefore I was taking it more seriously than they were. They however, were only interested in my becoming matriculated into our society’s chosen religious order.
I was far too precocious at the time. I wasn’t being dumb enough to just accept the faith in faith and go along with it blindly like all the other teenagers in Sunday school who, unlike me, were blissfully unconcerned about the plainly obvious religious contradictions that Christmas presented to Christianity. They were more concerned about receiving their new Nintendo 64.
When I reflect on my turbulent teen years wrestling with religion, I now realise that none of the elders took their faith seriously enough to have these questions answered already. You would think that after two thousand years, people would have thought about these things, like the Jehovah’s Witnesses. But alas, cognitive evolution has granted us the gift of reason.
In fact, the Jehovah’s Witnesses spend a great deal of time thinking about all of the tough questions young people ask so that they could come up with a manual (several in fact) to handle these circumstances. Psychologically, this is what you call an act of overcompensation, and is usually the first sign of a lie. So debunking the Jehovah’s Witnesses wasn’t too hard.
So there I was, 23 years old, and completely faithless. I got tired of hearing that “God did it” to continue such conversations — until I met a trusty Atheist who changed my mind about the whole deal. You’d think that it would be a Christian to do this, since Atheists are not preoccupied with the quality of faith. His take on the whole matter was remarkably elegant:
He said that despite the fact that Christmas is a farce and Christianity was born of pagan rituals, the source of the belief system was not originally designed to rule the world. That was the original Roman Catholic agenda — and Rome is no more. So all we’re left with is a relatively fun pagan ritual to enjoy every Sunday and Easter and Christmas. Am I missing anything? No? Well then ladies and gentlemen, the following principles shall therefore apply:
1. Commercialization Concerns are Irrelevant

Don’t worry about Santa Claus et al. He and his troupe of fantastic reindeer were nothing more than a marketing ploy to commercialize a pagan ritual. There’s no harm in that really, since it’s not very different from when the same people pay tithes to these extremely wealthy religious organisations that operate tax free. It’s really the same con, just a different scheme.
I call that poetic justice.
Ergo, all concerns about the commercialization of Christmas are irrelevant. There is no point in making a big deal about it – for all the same reasons why there’s no point in making a big deal about a con artist conning a con artist that you like. At least when you spend during Christmas, you get great deals and discounts. I cannot quite say the same for paying tithes.
If there were no Christmas, there would still be some end of year pagan holiday to take note of and the marketing gurus would’ve seized upon it anyway. Between Hanukkah and Kwanzaa, there are a myriad of other Sun/Light worshiping mythologies just waiting to be seized upon by the same brilliant department store viral marketing that gave us Santa Claus.
Finally, the banality of pagan worship doesn’t automatically invalidate how fun it is. I mean, what’s the point of living if you’re not going to enjoy it, right? So that’s why I’m going to take advantage of the price drops around this time of year and get me a wicked HDTV, another fad gadget and something equally epic for my girlfriend. Thus, I’ve only got one word for you all:
Amazon.com.
2. Religious Validation is Irrelevant

When people tell you that Christmas is about the celebration of the birth of Christ and then proceed to have pagan celebrations anyway, it shows that they neither fully understood what the implications of pagan worship were, nor the fact that the Bible never once called for a celebration of Christ’s birth in any way. Ignorance has a remarkable talent for such ubiquity.
In fact, for all you Christians out there, if you celebrated Christmas in any way shape or form this season, no matter how innocuous, (even attending a church service to commemorate the event), you are in fact validating a pagan sun worship ritual that has absolutely no Biblical foundation whatsoever. Therefore any corresponding justifications are ultimately irrelevant.
At this point in time however, there’s no point in launching a campaign to change any of that. The ritual is far too pervasive for any real meaningful result to come from telling every single Christian to suddenly stop what they’re doing in the name of maintaining any kind of Biblical congruency. Nobody seems to care precisely because it probably doesn’t really matter at all.
Furthermore, even if one could snap a finger and turn on the light in every Christian’s head about the obvious fallacy of their pagan worship rituals, to what end does it profit a man to take away a pagan practice from a religion that is entirely based on pagan rituals? What’s one less Solstice celebration? What good could possibly be achieved by invalidating the best part?
Ergo, religious validation by the Christian watch dog groups which are anti-Christmas (such as the Seventh Day Adventists and the Jehovah’s Witnesses) are not only effectively a pointless ruse, but they will likely be seen as being “too fringe” by the rest of Christendom to be effective ministers anyway. Kill joys aren’t taken seriously while everyone is busy having fun.
In terms of its fundamental and intrinsic value, Christmas is really an end of year celebration explicitly designed by an ancient pagan culture as a ritual of festivities. It has no religious significance whatsoever. That was the work of Pope Constantine III in a desperate attempt to unite Rome under Catholicism, thereby staving off what would be certain religious civil war.
In fact, if you hit up this checklist on the history of everything of Christmas origin, you will quickly realize that Christmas was always about the excess. It was never about religion. The idea that Jesus Christ has anything to do with Christmas is a nearly 2,000 year old lie. What really happened was that the original Saturnalia celebrations were hijacked by Christianity.
So even if there was no Christianity, there would still be an end of year tradition where the family comes together to celebrate each other. The tradition was never born in Christianity. It is really a function of a much older religion that is related to today’s Wicca movement. The Romans merely cobbled the two religions together, renaming the pagan ritual to Christmas.
If you take Rome out of the picture, all that we’re left with is a Sun God religion fused with an old Roman pagan ritual of feasting to celebrate the increase of Sunlight during the Winter Solstice. The rest of it is remnants of an age gone by, where religion and politics were joined at the hip. It does not matter that it is pagan in origin. The same can be said of Christianity.
So go ahead and hang those wreaths. Put up the Christmas tree with accompanying lights. Sing those Christmas Carols and read those passages of Scripture about the nativity scene all over again. Don’t let any of this inconsistency bother you. It doesn’t matter that there is no Biblical validity or that it’s pagan. None of it has any meaningful religious significance anyway.
3. Tradition Trumps Reason

Let’s be honest with ourselves: Christmas was never really about the babe in a manger or about Santa Claus. What’s the one thing that people do the most during Christmas? They all Celebrate Family. It’s a very strong cultural contingent of western civilization to celebrate the family unit during Christmas. That is precisely where Christmas gets almost all its momentum.
The family comes together to have a massive side of ham or turkey, or turducken, along with eggnog, lots of punch, Christmas cake and a horde of other calorie chocked goodies designed explicitly to ramp up the dopamine laced sense of excitement brimming with enough sucrose to exacerbate Grandma’s diabetes and to raise the suicide rate at all the nearby orphanages.
Then there are the gifts that are wrapped, the putting up of the Christmas tree, the wiring of the Christmas lights and other assorted activities which while in and of themselves are but a rather pointless exercise (since they’ll have to be undone come January anyway), serve the purpose of providing a series of fun activities for families to do together every winter season.
It’s made even more exciting when the cousins come over, or when the entire family goes to the home of the family patriarch for one massive family reunion where they sit around the piano while grandpa hammers out carol after carol in a giant, fun family karaoke sing-along in the wrong key, while your drunk single aunt and your gay uncle dance awkwardly in the hall.
The point is that these activities are done together to celebrate the family unit. The large majority of these activities have nothing to do with the birth of Christ or whether or not Christianity is of any significance in the grand scheme of things. Christianity may have been a contributing factor to these celebrations, but it was never the original point of them at all.
Conclusively,

I hope you have a brilliant Christmas. I know I will. I hope you did the whole Christmas tree bit, gained some weight at the dinner table, had a blast with your family and loved ones, put up lights, sang carols and raided Amazon.com on Black Friday. For contrary to popular belief, that’s precisely what Christmas is really all about. The rest is a pointless religious distraction.
Such things do not require logical explanations or scriptural validation. So long as people think it is significant, then it becomes significant. Rituals are a celebration of human nature. We are animals bound by routine. Concordantly, so long as we believe in the significance of the ritual, the logical explanations are inconsequential — except for the sole purposes of trivial pursuit.
As I’ve elaborated before, belief is not bound by the parameters of logic. It is determined by the will of the believer. So it may prove to be a grand waste of time to attempt to debunk Christmas. Unraveling it won’t make a difference in the grand scheme of things anyway. So enjoy it and shut the cuss up already. Merry Christmas everyone and have an epic New Year.
■ E-mail: accordingtoxen[at]gmail[dot]com



“I’ve already done a post that covers that too http://xenlogic.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/the-true-nature-of-god/ . It was my second post on this blog, actually.”
THAT is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you.
Xen, a request for 2011. For most of the years I’ve been reading your blog you have been debunking alot of myths about the Christian Faith, and I’m pretty sure you’ve made a few more atheists while you were at it.
I challenge you next year to both teach us and subsequently debunk some of the teachings of the next major faith in the world as well, Islam. This should be a particularly nice challenge for you seeing as you will be approaching it from a completely outside standpoint as you didn’t grow up in Islam as you did in christianity.
Alamanach and I were planning just such a project — but it requires a great deal of research, precisely because it is a religion that is immediately not as familiar to me as Christianity. So, I had best get my facts straight first. U zimi?
Coolness, I feel many mind-rapes are imminent. I’d like to offer my help (if needed) in any way I can. You know how to reach me.
Your posts, especially the religious ones, always tell us what isn’t. Christmas isn’t Christian, for example. (What’s with the obssessive overuse of the word ‘pagan,’by the way? You sound like a man who’s gone off his meds.) Someday, instead of continuing on about what isn’t, you must tell us what is. You keep insisting that Jesus is a rehash of old sun myths. Fair enough, but then what? You tell us that church leaders don’t actually know the truth. A defensible position, but, again, then what? What is the truth? What is the nature of God? What is the nature of man, and what is his relationship to God? You love tearing apart other people’s answers to those questions, but I’ve never seen you offer any answers of your own.
Sir Al,
Forgive my tardiness in responding. There was a lot on my plate. Literally.
I disagree. They all certify what is. You just don’t accept the ‘is’ part and are still hung up on the isn’t part — largely I suspect because you’re in denial about something. The tone of your comment suggests as much.
For example: in this post, I say that Christmas isn’t about the birth of Christ. I go on to say that it is about a pagan celebration that was inherited from ancient Rome.
I continue that therefore it isn’t about religion at all. Therefore what we currently use it for is what it’s really all about (commercialism, excess, family, etc). The religion part is an ancient Roman Catholic hijack of this older celebration. It therefore isn’t of any significance.
I think you see in my posts what you want to see, but not necessarily what is actually there. I suspect your objectivity is being compromised by your religiosity. That’s OK. It’s perfectly fine to be religious — so long as it is managed.
Because Christmas is pagan is pagan is pagan.
By the same quantum of logic, I could question your inability to see where I do offer answers of my own, that you subconsciously reject without actually saying so, and then subsequently suggest that I don’t offer answers at all. Why would you suspect therefore, that I’m on (or off) any meds? Wouldn’t it be better to be in a position where meds were not needed at all?
Ahh!
I would suspect so, good sir. Apropos, I suspect that it is thou, and not I who may be off medication of sorts — not that such ad hominems aid the forwarding of this discussion one way or another.
Concordantly, I would prefer to think that you disagree for subjective reasons, without realizing that you have. Perhaps it’s time to accept those reasons instead of avoiding them.
Someday, instead of continuing on about what I haven’t said, you must say that you reject my position, because of so and so — as has been done by TJ. His is a position of faith, and I can’t argue with that. If you simply stated that you disagree for reasons of your faith, I would have no argument against that at all.
However, to accuse me of not offering my own answers is preposterous — because I have. You just don’t accept them — which is fine. For such could potentially be the substance of a good debate, should it be obvious that you want one.
Remember the atheist at the outset of the post? He still goes to church even though he rejects the religion. Do you think I mentioned that for strictly anecdotal purposes? Why would I then go on to certify why the concept that religious justifications for not celebrating Christmas are unjustified?
Every narrative opinion has an explicit and an implicit meaning. The problem you’re having is that you’re not seeing the implicit as well as the explicit.
You’re still hung up on my post about Tough Questions Christians Fear, aren’t you? LOL! Fear not Master Al. A follow up post is already in the works.
In fact, that post was much longer (if you can believe it). However, for the purposes of length and clarity, I split it out into two separate posts. This post about Christmas was actually written a year ago while I was in China — but I quickly discovered that it segues perfectly into the follow up post that is appropriately titled “Now What?” to make for a nice 1-2-3 themed secularist op.
I think I’ve already done a post that covers that, where we had our last great discord.
I’ve already done a post that covers that too. It was my second post on this blog, actually.
See my comments above. Maybe you weren’t looking hard enough.
Xen
I appreciate the way you have investigated the underlying reasons for today’s rituals and not taken for granted the non sequiturs like ‘it’s Jesus’ birthday, so let’s decorate an evergreen.’
Still, I’ve ultimately come to a very different conclusion than what you have. I’ve found that Jesus himself, and later his apostles, warned repeatedly that the time was coming shortly when the Christian congregation would be overtaken by false ideas and would become worldly. This was *expected*. Jesus described this with his ‘wheat-and-weeds’ analogy. (Matthew 13:24-30,36-43) The wheat field would be overrun with weeds, and only at the harvest would they be separated again.
Paul reiterated this same thought, assuring his readers concerning the day of the Lord, that it “shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed.” (2 Thessalonians 2:3) He also mentioned that at that time, there was still something restraining that “man of sin” and the “falling away”. (2 Thessalonians 2:6)
Finally, at the close of the first century, John, the aged and last living apostle, wrote this warning, “Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.” (1 John 2:18)
So while I fully agree with you about Christmas’ obvious pagan roots, how it was adopted by the Church to placate pagan ‘converts’ to unify the Roman Empire, etc., I find no reason to tie Christmas with the foundation of Christianity in the least. The primitive Christianity of the first century is altogether different from the traditional Christianity that is found almost everywhere today, and this was prophesied to happen from the outset.
Thanks for your time.
“It’s made even more exciting when the cousins come over, or when the entire family goes to the home of the family patriarch for one massive family reunion where they sit around the piano while grandpa hammers out carol after carol in a giant, fun family karaoke sing-along in the wrong key, while your drunk single aunt and your gay uncle dance awkwardly in the hall.”
LOL!!! Man you slay me