How White Men Conquered the World
It’s not by hypocrisy that the playing field isn’t level. It’s by necessity.
- Xenocrates
The greatest conquerors of the old (and new) world are white. Why is that?
Have you ever wondered how is it that white folks essentially control the vast majority of the power in the world? I’ve heard many theories on the subject, from Afrocentric philosophers to white supremacists – all of which have gaping holes in their logic. The answer is deceptively simple. This time, it’s nurture that has compelled nature in the most profound way possible.
Stating the Obvious
I usually need to do a one paragraph preamble to ward off stoic trolls, because unfortunately, most people don’t understand the purpose of language and so instead of getting caught in yet another debate about semantics versus material, let me state the obvious. I don’t believe in race superiority. I believe in genetic advantage. Race and genetics are mutually exclusive, since unlike the latter, the former doesn’t exist. If you don’t understand this, then read no further.
Thanks.
Genetic Advantage?
When I speak of Genetic Advantage, I’m referring to a specific expression of the human genotype (i.e., a phenotype) that has the greatest advantage in the current environmental configuration. No individual phenotype is intrinsically advantageous (meaning no race is inherently superior), since that is determined entirely by variable environmental conditions.
That’s why Hitler was wrong about Aryan Supremacy (from a scientific point of view).
If the environment changes, then the current dominant phenotype will be immediately put in a precarious position, as the advantage would slowly shift to another – which is exactly what has been happening over the last 200 years. In another 100 years, the current dominant human phenotype will be relegated to second place, because the environment is changing.
Necessary Deprecation
Before we continue, I thought it necessary to establish the necessary deprecation of two words: “Race” and “Caucasian”. Why? Because the word “race” has no intrinsic scientific value. It describes a set of features that were functions of group migration across the environment. Many, many more races are possible. Our environment is just too limited to expose them all. Additionally, people of mixed descent are not socially recognized by the word.
There are eight classes of Caucasians as described by the Meyers-Blitz Lexikon (1932), which are (from left to right, top down) Nordic, Dinaric, Mediterranean, Alpine, East Baltic, Turks, Bedouins and Afghans.
Secondly, the word “Caucasian” arose out of the theory that all white people emerged from a region between Europe and Iran called Caucasus, and it describes a very wide range of ethnic groups. Caucasians include most fair skinned “races”, which automatically includes anyone who has the skull structure, if not the corresponding skin color. Thus, Aryans, Indians and Arabs are all considered Caucasian – only to establish Aryans as white and the rest as not.
This type of controversial classification only has social value. Words that only have social value tend to become abused to fit phobic agendas (such as racism) and thus are inherently loaded. Similarly, describing Negroes as “People of African descent” is inherently fallacious, as proven by The Genographic project, confirming the theory that all of mankind is of African descent.
So how did white men conquer the world, exactly? Through several functions of cause and effect which occurred in a specific sequence that would create that effect, starting out with:
Genetic Mutation
Blue Eyes are one of the most distinctive genetic mutations in humans.
The phenotype commonly referred to as Caucasians has many more conspicuous, traceable mutations (such as white skin and blue eyes) in the last 20 – 50 thousand years than all the others. Where as other phenotypic group expressions (commonly referred to as “races”) differ primarily in orthopedic, (and more specifically, cranial) qualities, there are enough variations in Europeans to functionally deprecate any further use of the words “race” and “Caucasian“.
White people are uniquely different from virtually all other phenotypic groups in that the genetic mutations that created them are vastly more distinct. They constitute a larger number of diverse physical characteristics that are not as subtle as the variations that exist in other groups. Thus, the prevalence of white people across the world speaks to what many scientists believe to be natural selection due to the perception of an apparent innovative survivability by female mates within the group of this distinct phenotype, giving generational prominence.
This is why blue and green eyes, fair skin, blond, brown and red straight hair became the standard qualities that describe people of this group. Virtually all of these qualities are genetic mutations that were simply given preference over most others when they first occurred, thus giving them a greater degree of ubiquity in the group than the other existing permutations.
Environmentally fueled Cognition
Now while the genetic filtration process occurred in Africa due to migration, those who had migrated north found more favorable ground in which to propagate their groups as Africa had changed. The once northern temperate zones passed closer to the equator due to continental shift, making the continent less hospitable to fertile produce, agriculture and livestock.
Those who migrated north found cooler, more temperate zones where their cognition could develop at a normal pace as the nutritional support was far better. If all migratory groups had the same nutritional opportunities, no single group would have a stronger cognitive pulse. Those who remained in Africa could not have nurtured as favorably as the northern folk, and so the vicious cycle of nature compelling nurture, produced in Europe what it didn’t in Africa:
Civilization
It is fair to say that civilization evolved out of the lands north of Africa first. In fact, from what we know, civilization erupted in the middle east long before it got anywhere else in the dark continent. The further north humans got, the more advanced their civilizations became. It’s the same humans in each group. However, any group migrating out of Africa got a jump start.
This is why after 60,000 years of evolution, the northern folks were able to revisit Africa in their now finely refined, fair skinned, brown haired, blue eyed, cotton clad, gun toting, sea faring, gold digging, monarchy backed personas, only to see their fellow humans in almost the same position they left them 60,000 years earlier living in relatively primitive civilizations.
Absolute Conquest
When the fair skinned humans noticed the obvious intellectual, social and economic disparity between the societies they came from and the societies (for lack of a better word) in which they found their African brothers, they assumed, unscientifically, that they were superior. Naturally, this created a superiority complex among the Europeans rediscovering Africa.
Little did our fair skinned brothers realize (they would not have discovered DNA and genetics for another 500 years) that the reason for the disparity is not intrinsic to their culture (or nature), but rather was merely a reflection of a very slight advantage their long forgotten fore fathers had, that they weren’t even aware of. The rest is history: Slavery, Racism, Apartheid.
For black folks reading this, the fair skinned men from the northern lands weren’t the first to enslave darker skinned humans. That was just the most recent case. In fact, Africans have been enslaved at least five times in world history. At the very least, the Arabs, Greeks, Persians, Romans and various European nations such as Portugal and Holland all chipped in.
As a result, the darker men in Africa constantly had their culture being rebooted every 500 – 2,000 years by their smarter, more cognitively evolved, fairer skinned northern land dwelling brothers. Some 700 years later, Africa is still trying to play catch up to the rest of the world, as it desperately tries to recover from the repeated culture rape of the last 5,000 years or so.
Now that Africa was sore, the status quo had been established.
The Status Quo
This is perhaps the most important step in world domination for our fair skinned northern brothers. The white man had not only demonstrated his raw cognitive, military and social superiority to the Africans, but an offshoot of his y-chromosome that migrated to the far east was also no stranger to the Europeans’ firm leather boots. The Asians were next on the list.
Having established a Status Quo throughout Europe, battling among themselves for about 1000 years, using everything from fire to religion and then milking the dark continent of its ore and its physically superior, but cognitively inferior denizens, making an impact on the far east wasn’t too hard. Besides, their kung-fu was no match for a few ships armed with cannons.
After Africa and Asia fell under the boot of their fairer skinned brothers, they decided that the rest of the world needed conquering. So they mounted ships and repeated everything they did in Africa over the last 4,000 years to the y-chromosome cousins of the Asians in Northern, Central and Southern America. As they’ve done this before, it was second nature by now.
Concordantly, this is why:
We speak European languages
With each act of conquest, the white man proceeded to impart to all of his conquered subjects his ways, his science, his art, his philosophy, his language, his governance structure, the appreciation of his women as the de facto standard of beauty, his technology, his education, thereby matriculating the rest of the world over the next 400 years into his standards.
Aside from genetics, one of the distinctive differences between ethnic groups, is language. If you’re not white and you’re reading this, then you are a living example of the superiority of Europe. To demonstrate this effectively, I invite you to consider the following anecdote: A friend asked me recently: “How many languages do you speak?” I then responded as follows:
- Ich spreche Deutsches (German)
- Nihongo ga wakarimasu (Japanese)
- Je parle Français (French)
- Hablo español, y… (Spanish)
- I speak English
They thought that was really impressive – but I was somewhat ashamed. Why? Because I don’t know a single word of Swahili. I know the languages of some of the cultures that made their mark upon the world, but I didn’t know any of the languages of my origin. Though to be fair, Africa is teeming with indigenous tongues. The average educated African speaks about three or four languages. Never the less, the ubiquity of European languages speaks volumes.
It says that:
The world is defined by European standards
Images like this often send the wrong message to young black women about beauty.
I’ve had Asian friends complain about the invasion of China by the west, when China uses a system of government white men invented. It’s the same way how black folks complain that racism inhibited black people, even though they don’t have to worry about yellow fever, and are earning six figure salaries in white run companies. The hypocrisy is hilarious, to say the least, since China owes its wealth to America and Africans living in the west are not as poor.
It’s the same reason why most western black people would never return to Africa, why Latinos are trying to escape Mexico, why you’re Asian and you don’t know a single word in Chinese, or why your government is no longer run by a Monarchy or a religious elite. White people have reformed our thinking and given us the ability to think about things in a wholly different way.
It is not surprising that our education systems, our governments, our politics, our clothing, the technology we use, the sports we play, many of our cultural idiosyncrasies and much of the music we love is largely based on European standards. Europeans and their descendants have defined much of what you now come to take for granted, because it was “always there“.
That’s why complaining about the hypocrisy and inequality between races is an intrinsically redundant argument. It is not by hypocrisy that the playing field isn’t level. It’s by necessity. I know this sounds Machiavellian from the outset, but all peoples needed to evolve out of their barbarianism sooner or later. Whites just got there first and are now spreading that around.
If white men had not intervened when they did, many peoples would still be living in primitive societies plagued by dangerous diseases and barbaric cultural practices. I know you might be thinking that white folks could have done the same thing without the hideous crimes against humanity. Those were certainly regrettable, but all ethnic groups are guilty of the same crime.
The unification of China saw the slaughter and exile of many ethnic Chinese groups that brought the Han Chinese to prominence. The same thing is happening in Africa even today, most recently with the genocide in Darfur and Rwanda. Even prehistoric neanderthals had similar periods of ethnic cleansing. So white people are no more vile than the rest of humanity.
That’s just human nature at work.
However, the humanity that grew out of European influence would not have occurred without the preceding brutality. Human nature is such that the greatest good only occurs after the greatest evil. It would have happened with us too. However, since the environment gave whites the obvious cognitive advantage, they went through those phases before all others.
That’s would consequently explain:
Why other groups have some inferiority complex
Consultants from DFID (right) meet with the Jamaican government (left).
I mentioned once on this blog before that I’ve never seen a black run government hire black consultants to do any kind of work related to social development. The United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) and the Canadian Inter Development Agency are some of the primary sources of social development consultancy in the third world.
There’s a very good reason for that.
European cultures have already gone through hundreds of years of teething pains when it came to social development. Thus, once they solved those problems, they passed it down through generations of documentation, building on their previous knowledge, developing the the first world societies they now live in. Other cultures were still primitives at the same time.
Even so, I’ve seen enough cases where black men in black run governments would much rather give a multi-million dollar consulting contract to white men from a foreign land than to their own black natives. I’ve seen the very same thing in Asia as well. So I know it’s not unique to black people. In fact, the same thing happens in many developing nations across the world.
What really fascinated me though, is that during my high school years, even though we had a very mixed student population, the black kids seemed to develop a certain deeper respect for those of our teachers who were white that wasn’t exactly duplicated for those who were black. I thought it was odd at first, until I saw the black teachers doing the same thing – even for those white teachers whom they supervised. How bizarre is that? I thought that was odd.
It wasn’t until years later during my late teens that I read about a psychological condition called an “inferiority complex” and a corresponding “superiority complex“. Adolf Hitler and his Nazi kin are probably the best demonstration of the latter.
It would appear as though the massively unique number of mutations that generated white men not only served to their advantage among their own kin, but also among the rest of the world. It’s as if their collective inferiority complex caused them to subconsciously hand the keys of the world to the white man. It was Africans who sold blacks into slavery. The same thing happened in Asia. Everyone who has ever blamed white people for the world’s problems seems to forget those small historical details. They didn’t take it away. It was given to them.
That’s what has in turn created:
The Brain Drain on the third world
In many third world nations, being educated at a local university is not quite as prestigious as graduating from one in North America or Europe – even though the course content is exactly the same in most cases. The thing is that when people migrate north to study, they rarely return home to implement their knowledge. It’s white folks working as volunteers who do that.
Oh, the irony.
So while the smartest people who are born in backwater towns are the best hope of that town moving into the modern age, they are often forced to find work in the northern lands because they are either threatened by crime or economic stagnation. This is why universities in first world nations are offering full scholarships to the brightest living in the third world.
This not only robs the third world of its smartest people, but it creates a one way road into first world economies, making them even stronger and more powerful. I honestly can’t blame them. Bright people tend to have very little patience with troglodytes. I can especially relate because of cases where brilliant third world personalities are snuffed out by crime because their foreign ideas threatened the businesses in their home state that refused to innovate.
That would never happen to a white man coming into the community to do the same thing though. The biggest companies in the world are owned by people of European descent. So even where a third world local fails to implement his innovative ideas in his country due the collective ignorance of his countrymen, white men will be able to do just that without any resistance at all. The inferiority complex of the natives is what gives the white men that power.
It is no small wonder then that:
There is White Privilege
I watch the BBC a lot – largely because of their highly educational documentaries – particularly the Horizon series. One of the things I’ve gleaned from the BBC is how white men can literally go to any part of the world and they will be given the right of way. Even the local authorities in some countries seem to defer to the “appearance” of authority inherent in visiting white men.
Racial profiling is practically nonexistent on white people. I have never heard of any other group of humans that has enslaved Caucasians – aside from when it was done by other Caucasians (the Barbary Slave Trade). This means that unlike Negroes, Asians and other phenotypic expressions, there is virtually no time in recorded history where a substantial portion of the white race was disenfranchised because of the colour of their skin. Not even World War II’s atrocities matched that of the Atlantic African slave trade.
Never the less, I can only imagine that for the most part, it must feel good to be white given the rest of the world’s inherent delusion that the biological qualities of the Europeans are anything more than just biological. So although third world governments are free of colonial rule, they still defer to their colonial masters, completely misreading their assertive nature.
Accountability
But let us avoid denial: Who was brave enough to sail across the seemingly flat surface of the Earth to discover the New World? Who do you see hanging with the Gorillas in the mist? Who is exploring the deepest darkest corners of the Oceans and daring to explore the cold dark expanse of space? White men. You rarely ever see any other ethnic group doing these things.
Love or hate them, we owe a great deal of our cognitive evolution to white men. But let us not get distracted. Any group of humans that migrated out of Africa to the north west would have evolved into fair skinned, blue eyed, brown haired explorers extraordinaire. The environment is what facilitated the genetic mutations. Technically, any phenotypic expression of the human genotype can produce any other. They weren’t white while they were primitive tribes in Africa.
Either way, none of that matters anymore.
Conclusively
The impending ubiquity of technology has effectively shrunken the world. While great divides still exist economically between white societies and all others, the rest of the world has finally caught up with the cognitive levels of white men – and white men are to be thanked for that. It is they who after all have educated the rest of the world on their social advancements.
No longer does the USA hold a monopoly on economies of scale nor is it the manufacturing center of the world. China now has that honor. The greatest minds in the world may still be mostly white, but now those great minds include Africans, Asians, Hispanics and every other variation of humanity in between. This is how whites have ultimately redeemed themselves.
Make no mistake though – white people still rule the world. The only thing changing this, is that there is a limitation to cognitive evolution. The more educated a group becomes, the more interested it will be in the pursuit of knowledge and the less interested it will be in the pursuit of procreation. White populations around the world, from America to Europe, are dwindling.
This is the change that will ultimately unseat the dominant phenotype – maybe not in our lifetimes, but certainly eventually. White populations are not expanding as quickly as that of other groups – most notably people of Asian, Latin and Negro descent. If the rate of cognitive evolution remains the same and the negative population growth of Europeans is unmitigated, we may very well see a successful shift in the dominant phenotype from Europeans to Asians.
Even so, this is not a cause for concern. There will always be white people around. That their populations are shrinking is only a function of being the first to civilize. That will be the fate of all distinct human groups. For as I said before, no phenotype is inherently superior by design. The perception is a fallacy based on the deceptive evolutionary impact of the environment.
Genetic advantage is a fleeting thing.
■ E-mail: accordingtoxen[at]gmail[dot]com
Leave a Reply
View in your language
Add me to your circle on:
World Visitors
[Edited for spelling, grammar, language and clarity - Xen]
I like some of your ideas they seem to point blacks to accepting a point that is difficult to swallow. Simply put that there are some things that whites do better than us. This acceptence does not mean that they are better genetically as a people. It only says that they cultivate different values or skill-set. One of the simplest ideas that has helped them more than any other, and perharps since the last 2000 yrs is their obsession with the idea of “race” which to me is maniacal to the point off [being a] clinical disorder.
Also to say that whites have not been dominated and marginalized in the past is to stop short of proper research. They have been but do not expect whites to brag about it in their history books. There has been times when it was considered a curse to be white and if one cannot believe that it shw how far he has been brain washed. All it takes is for the blacks or asians or any group to rise socially and politically before it seeks to dominate others that are different. And there was such a time in history when being black was the “in” thing. That is why Solomon said in his songs “I am black and comely”.
Also, Whites are not oiginators of the civilizations and science they hold today. When Columbus and others came to the “New-World”the blacks and indians were living in more developed material and spiritual cultures than the whites had hence their inspired and systematic jealousy to destroy them. Remember the white man is better at everything he accuses others of. He is a systematic liar. Ask yourself why if a people is so superior would they have to always RUB it in like that. Only because deep within their pschee whites knw its all nonsense and that they are only trying to fabricate history so they have to resort to lies and violence to convince us and more than anything else eternal vigilance that the lie be not exposed.
Jason,
I have a few comments:
Irrelevant. I’ve already declared at the outset of the post that:
False. Cultural sophistication is directly proportional to environmental favor. We all cultivate these skill sets now. That’s why you can speak and write in English (for the most part) at all.
Conjecture. White people may have made mistakes. However, to blanket them all as having a “maniacal disorder” is clearly based on your emotional bias against them. You have no facts to support your argument that cannot also be leveled at people from other races.
Ad Hominem. The Barbary Slave Trade included white people who were captured on raids. It wasn’t however, exclusive to white people. It also included blacks and some middle eastern prisoners. There were also white slaves during the Greek, Persian and Roman Empires. However, those slaves also included people from a wide variety of phenotypes. However, there is no slavery event in history that rivals that of the Atlantic Slave Trade which was EXCLUSIVE to blacks. None. Not one.
Ad Hominem. Even if what you say was remotely accurate (and for the record, it is not) the post asks the question “Why do white men rule the world?” The question is in the present tense. If there ever was a time when being white was a curse, it is as of the last 5,000 years of human history, now woefully irrelevant.
Irrelevant. You do realize I’ve said this multiple times in the post, right?
Anecdotal. Solomon’s conceited opinion of himself does not an era define. I too think I am black and comely. However, just because I think so, doesn’t mean that the rest of the world is obligated to agree.
Cognitive Dissonance. If Columbus et al were in any way inferior to the Arawaks, they would not have driven them almost to the point of extinction.
Logical Fallacy. The ability to accuse one’s accuser of a mutually leveled accusation is not dictated by skin color.
False. White people have made many scientific discoveries that are provable, ostensible phenomena. If white people were indeed “systemic liars” as you put it, then their discoveries would also be a lie – which we know are not, because we can prove them to be true using mathematics, physics, biology and chemistry even to this day. If that is true, then the liar is not the white man, but the man who accuses him of lying. This consequently proves my previous point (that The ability to accuse one’s accuser of a mutually assured accusation is not dictated by skin color) is ergo true and I happen to be a black man — QED.
Cognitive Dissonance. Calling the grapes sour doesn’t change the fact that you the fox, couldn’t reach them. However, if a squirrel got to the grapes before you and your entire clan of foxes could, it would mean that as far as gathering grapes are concerned, squirrels are superior. However, the point of the post is not that squirrels are inherently superior (thereby invalidating the point you’re trying to make). The point is that the squirrel has an advantage that gives him the illusion of superiority. You the fox however, shouldn’t beat yourself up about it. Squirrels can’t hunt prey like foxes can.
If you don’t understand the implications of this metaphor, then you would be proving some racist white men to be right about blacks.
Cognitive Dissonance. If you’re trying to prove that white men are not superior by suggesting that they have successfully lied and deceived their way to superiority, then you have miserably failed to do so because:
1. Superiority is not the point of this article; advantage is.
2. The fact that they still run the world means that there is some kind of advantage at work, which means that;
3. Even if they lied and deceived their way to the top, it means they are smarter than all the people to whom they lied and deceived, ergo;
4. The underlying implications of the point you’re trying to make automatically invalidates itself, apropos;
5. Your point is therefore invalid.
Cheers,
Xen
are you aware that most white people don’t have blue eyes? I’m just curious. Certainly green eyes and red hair aren’t as common among Europeans as brunette hair and brown eyes.
I’ve noticed that non-whites like to exagerate fair traits among so-called “whites”.
Yes I’m quite aware. I merely used blue eyes as a conspicuous example.
Jason, Please read Real History
If white people were indeed “systemic liars” as you put it, then their discoveries would also be a lie – which we know are not, because we can prove them to be true using mathematics, physics, biology and chemistry even to this day. If that is true, then the liar is not the white man.
Physics, Biology and Chemistry come out of Africa – There was no Europe !! In Mali, West Africa, lives a tribe of people called the Dogon. The Dogon are believed to be of Egyptian decent and their astronomical lore goes back thousands of years…
• The fact that Whites and Asians have 4% Neandertal genes, and African blacks have 0%, is telling. A lot of Whites and Asians are perfectly fine with that–a feeling of relief and satisfaction. It indicates a real genetic difference between the two races vis-a-vis blacks, which might explain the perennial IQ and civilizational gap. Suddenly, Neanderthals are superstars, with their bigger brains, light skin and longevity. They survived longer than humans, and in challenging, frozen environments.
takfam07 1 month ago
• @takfam07 – 1) If you actually knew anything about the subject, you would be laughing at yourself. White machinations to get away from the truth of Albinism is at once, funny and pathetic. Having been at this for a long time: I can recall when the White myth was that you evolved as is, in Europe. When that failed, you changed Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon from being non-humans to archaic Homo, and claimed that you evolved from Cro-Magnon.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• 2) When that failed, you claimed that you started out as the Black Grimaldi in Europe, but because of the colder temperatures, lack of Sunshine and vitamin D, at about 6-12,000 years ago, you turned White. Now it’s Na,na,na, we may be Albinos from Central Asia, but we’re still different, we have something that you don’t, NEANDERTHAL GENES! Wow aren’t we great! You’re sad, that’s what you are – sad.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• 3) Before going on, let me be clear that I do not begrudge you your Neanderthal genes, you are quite welcome to them. This is about exposing the White man’s lies and falsifications, that’s all. The White media is central to the White man’s propagation of his lies, and a careful watch of Wiki reveals where they are going. It used to be that modern man was about 400,000 years old. But then I started seeing at Wiki, that he was only 160 – 200,000 years old.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• 4) It USED to be that Neanderthal remains have been found in the North Africa, Middle East, Europe, and Central Asia. Now at Wiki, they make it very clear that NO Neanderthal remains have been found in Africa. Even Encyclopædia Britannica, TRIES to go along with the lie Quote: Neanderthals inhabited Eurasia from the Atlantic Europe eastward to Central Asia and Belgium southward to the Mediterranean and southwest Asia. Similar human populations lived at the same time in eastern Asia and Africa.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• 5) Notice that little word play with the last sentence? Whites always try to bamboozle the ignorant with half-truths. Everyone should watch my new video “Naive_new” it goes into this sort of thing. Now for the facts: Neanderthal is a hybrid of Modern humans and Homo-Erectus – who still existed as late as 300,000 B.C. and born in North Africa and the middle East. Neanderthal remains have been found in the North Africa, Middle East, Europe, and Central Asia – homeland of Dravidian Albinos.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• 6) Cro-Magnons were a hybrid of Neanderthal and Modern humans, also born in North Africa and the Middle East. Cro-Magnon is found all over Europe, the Mediterranean, and Asia. Evidence from a few sites indicate that Neanderthals coexisted for several thousand years with Modern Humans; who arrived in Europe at about 45,000 B.C, and Cro-Magnons, who arrived in Europe by 35,000 B.C. Neither Neanderthal nor Cro-Magnon went south, so of course Southern Africans would not have admixture with them.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• 7) Those first modern humans in Europe were the Khoisan Grimaldi man. Emblematic of which, were the Venus figures of Steatopygia Females. The Mal’ta-Buret’ culture on the upper Angara River, just above Mongolia, in Siberia Russian, are Grimaldi sites. Entering East Asia from the south were the Black Mongols and the Jomon of Japan – who share the same haplogroup as Andaman Islanders in the Indian Ocean.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• 8) The Denisova hominin that lived about 41,000 years ago, and found in Denisova Cave, Altai Krai, Russia (west of Mal’ta), and shares a common origin with the Neanderthals and interbred with the ancestors of modern Melanesians, is entirely consistent with normal Black history. It’s really a Ho-hum affair, why Whites want to make a big to-do about Neanderthal admixture is a mystery, as Blacks in Europe and Asia also had Neanderthal admixture, and were likely not too proud of it.
AncientHistorian1 1 month ago
• @AncientHistorian1 Is there DNA evidence confirming that Khoisan first populated Europe? They might have the oldest human haplotypes, but by 50,000 BC, modern humans were already around for a full 3/4ths of their entire time on earth. In fact, what evidence is there that original Khoisan–not admixed with Bantu, as they all are today–were black? Also, was steatopygia a uniquely Khoisan or Negroid characteristic? And DNA-wise, aren’t Andaman Islanders among the furthest removed from Africa?
takfam07 1 month ago
• @AncientHistorian1 I enjoy your arguments, but two fallacies are in play. First, your entire premise is that the “white” science of human evolution is based on a grand conspiracy to glorify whites and marginalize blacks. Wow! And second, that modern humans who came out of Africa 100,000 years ago were necessarily black. We can talk all day about the first point. As for the second, why would humans in the late Pleistocene (Ice Age) have already developed Negroid phenotypic characteristics?
takfam07 1 month ago
• finally evolution explained when the world started to get hot and climate change blacks popped out white people, who since lacked dark skin, short hair, and dark eyes, caused there brain(the now dominate trait) to evolve to become smarter, causing them to migrate all over the world and build the greatest of civilizations ever
heatherkay28 1 month ago
• The last Whites to arrive were the Turks, who were chased out-of-Asia by the Mongolians. You may test your own theorizing skills, by trying to figure-out why nobody wanted Whites to remain in their ancestral lands in Asia. The result of course, was to dump them on the Blacks and mulattoes in Europe, who had just overcome the upheavals caused by the earlier Whites from Asia, the so-called Hellenes and Latin’s.
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
• 2) The Roman historian Jordanes, in his book on the history of the Goths, called “Getica” (circa 551 A.D), gives this account as to why the White tribes (Germanics and Slavs) started westward into Europe. Quote: Balamber, king of the Huns, took advantage of his ill health to move an army into the country of the Ostrogoths, from whom the Visigoths had already separated because of some dispute.
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
• 3) Meanwhile Hermanaric, who was unable to endure either the pain of his wound or the inroads of the Huns, died full of days at the great age of one hundred and ten years. The fact of his death enabled the Huns to prevail over those Goths who, as we have said, dwelt in the East and were called Ostrogoths. The Visigoths, who were their other allies and inhabitants of the western country, were terrified as their kinsmen had been, and knew not how to plan for safety against the race of the Huns.
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
• 4) After long deliberation by common consent they finally sent ambassadors into Romania to the Emperor Valens, brother of Valentinian, the elder Emperor, to say that if he would give them part of Thrace or Moesia to keep, they would submit themselves to his laws and commands. That he might have greater confidence in them, they promised to become Christians, if he would give them teachers who spoke their language. Also see; The historian Zosimus (491-518), his book “Historia Nova”.
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
• 5) Above I said “the so-called Hellenes” because as “Herodotus” states quote: “The Hellenic race has never, since its first origin, changed its speech. This at least seems evident to me. It was a branch of the Pelasgic (the original Blacks of Greece), which separated from the main body, and at first was scanty in numbers and of little power; but it gradually spread and increased to a multitude of nations, chiefly by the voluntary entrance into its ranks of numerous tribes of barbarians (Whites).
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
• 6) Now then, to the Celts: Modern scholars describe the historical Celts as a diverse group of tribal societies in Europe. It begins with the “Corded Ware” culture in Germany/Austria developing in various areas from about 3200 B.C. to 2300 B.C. Many know it as the Hallstatt culture, which lasted from approximately 800 to 400 B.C. Immediately we see that there is no way the “REAL” Celts could have been White. The culture developed before Black Europeans had ever heard of Asian Albinos.
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
• 7) Now lets be clear on something: Nowhere do the Blacks or anybody else call themselves “Celts”. This is a term created by modern Whites to jumble everybody up, so as to confuse history. Likewise with the term “Gaul” there were no people named Gauls, that is a place name.
So then, White boys and girls, men and women: Everything above is easily verifiable by you, it is factual history. So why don’t YOU know it? Why isn’t it in your textbooks? The answer is simple!
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
• 8) Your kind has no history, so they decided to create one for you. Thus they tell you that your culture derives from the Greeks and Romans – the civilizations your Barbaric people destroyed. They even teach you that your kind had something to do with the ancient civilizations of Egypt and the Middle East – Really? But at least now you know why the Mongols ran you out of Asia: who would want so degenerate a people around, that would even steal the history of others.
AncientHistorian1 2 months ago
Reply
• @ greeny. Were you expecting something else. Maybe something more glorious like aliens making the white man or through some godly magical process the white man was born. This is the most logical & likely explanation of White origins that I have ever seen. It may be ennoble but at least it’s natural.
SkillerMega 2 months ago
All European museums are full of CLASSIC AFRICAN ARTIFACTS from NUBIA, ZIMBABWE, Egypt, SOUTH AFRICA, NIGERIA, CAMEROON, ETHIOPIA etc but yet they say we have no history
I bet if we RECLAIM all AFRICAN ARTIFACTS European museums will be a SAD SCENE
As a Black Man who grew up in Queens, NY, yet has lived in Atlanta, GA for more than 18 years , post HS. graduation, undergraduate & graduate degrees, it is amusing to me to constantly hear the justification and occasional defending of the institution of chattel slavery that was forced upon my people, here, for multiple hundreds of years…. The greatest Crime the world has ever witnessed….
Few White people can comprehend being kidnapped, transported 9,000 miles and then forced into a barbaric system, and SURVIVING the untold atrocities that occured from 1555 thru the 20th century ( lynchings, jim crow, etc.). It is comical to read her diary, and weep at her “misfortunes”.
Perhaps she should have asked an 8 year old Black Girl who probably was raped & impregnated by a white “Massa”, after watching her father castrated & hung what real problems were…
This is a phenomenon I like to call “John Wayne Gacy” syndrome. When Gacy got caught with the 30 dead kids in his basement,he was smiling and joking about it…until he found out he was going to be punished for it. All of a sudden, he completely denies everything and calls HIMSELF the victim. That’s caucasoid mentality. After everything they’ve done and are doing, they consider themselves the victim. Ain’t that a bitch?
At the college I went to I was a part of the nerdier subcultures represented in it. In fact I was in the video game and anime clubs which were full of people who weren’t the most social adjusted types around. Well, there was this one People need to be respectful of neighbourhood watchman and security and the police.
The weird things about it is, they never speak about how the imperialist nation stole America, parts of Indonesia, the Indies, Australia, South Africa and many other countries where people of colour originate from. They are like spoilt children who want to take what they want but not let others play with THEIR toys. No wonder people of colour are starting to develop a strong dislike for the genetic recessive human being. What a hypocrite. And the way this woman speaks in front of her child! Who DOES THAT!? That is so tacky and classless. Ew
whites have been enslaved by non-whites many times in history. The Slavs were enslaved by Central Asians and Arabs. Arabs preffered slaves who were racially distinct from them. Black Africans and Europeans were the most popular types for slaves in the Muslim world. So the Slavic people’s “whiteness” was a factor in their enslavement.
i agree that this has been true throughout much of current human history. however, what i have recently (or, rather, for the past 10+ years) begun to notice is that white people are losing their edge as other races are beginning to reject their ideals. because they ha ve been “at the top”for so long, they as a group have begun to lose their edge as a collective. i have often found them to be some of the most weak, useless, and myopic of all races (and i am making this claim dispassionately). because the world is getting smaller and other voices are demanding to be heard, AND because they as a collective know very little about anything that isn’t white, their stronghold has begun to weaken. others are evolving but they do not seem to be. they are not spiritually or emotionally equipped to handle change and have begun to buck the system they created. i find it interesting that when they need to grow spiritually, physically, or emotionally, the immerse themselves in some aspect of yellow, brown, or black culture to finesse this growth. it would appear that other racial collectives at least have the choice of drawing upon their own history, traditions, and folklore to facilitate spiritual and emotional growth. once this growth is anchored, they can then take the necessary steps to move forward in the “white man’s world.”
so if all this is true and you said that environment was the single largest contributing factor then that would imply, that all in america are eventually (whites included) are going to devolve into native Americans. white people in africa are going to devolve into blacks, and the people who are now in the “favorable area” are going, if they are not already, going to evolve into smart whites. if your beliefs are true the advantage will never fleet for it is constant and it all depends upon, in your words “Those who migrated north found cooler, more temperate zones where their cognition could develop at a normal pace as the nutritional support was far better.’ if food and climate determine everything then whoever lives in the choice area will always outdo everyone else, after all we can change from black people to white people so we should be able to devolve as well, right back into primitive black people who cant think there way out of a wet paper bag. Even with all your back up and supposed full-proof logic your argument sounds as riddled as the supremacist and Afrocentric’s. and the more people search for knowledge the less they procreate? why? the main reason for live is not to learn, it is simply to live.
Dre:
Two things:
1. The environment provided the opportunity for mutation.
2. There’s no such thing as “De-evolution”. Once a mutation occurs, it stays. Forever.
Everything else in your comment is rendered irrelevant by that alone.