Why Life is not fair
If survival is only for the fittest then all men weren’t created equal.
- Xenocrates
Survival is only for the fittest. No exceptions.
Life is all about survival. Survival is all about competition. There would be no point to there being a competition if we all were made exactly identical to each other. We may all be of the same general design, but where the environment is concerned, some of us are much better implemented than others. That’s why only the fittest will survive while even the fit, will perish.
Like this:
Categories: Life, People, Science
Africa, African-American, American Embassy, Apple Computers, Barack Obama, Bill Gates, Black People, Bob Marley, Caucasian, Charles Darwin, Cheetah, Darwin, DELL Computers, Dell Inc, Discovery Channel, dna, Evolution, Gazelle, Henry Louis Gates Jr., Inequality, J.P. Rushton, Jamaica, Macintosh, Megan Fox, Michael Dell, Microsoft, Negro, Poker, Race, Race Evolution and Behaviour, Racial Profiling, Racism, Science, Slavery, species, Steve Jobs, survival of the fittest, Third World, United Kingdom
This is ridiculous. Has it ever occurred to you that the whiter skin denotes a population that is in colder, less UV climes which means you have to innovate to survive (as opposed to the tropics where food is plentiful, so no agriculture, and climate is favourable, so no need for huge development of living space). That doesn’t make them more superior, it just means one is adapted to one place better than another. Like introducing a species suddenly into a foreign environment, some species become pests since their adaptations are not countered by local species. White people to the rest of the world seem to fit the bill here. For “me again”, you are simply defining the game in your own terms and unsurprisingly winning.
Lachy,
I’ve heard the same argument about Asians, that because they live in such extreme environs, they had to adapt to match the areas in which they lived, which includes innovation. That is fine.
However, how do you explain the extreme environs that black people lived in central, sub Saharan Africa where a similar level of innovation failed to materialize? Answer me that one, sir.
Umm they did, they were the first civilizations to domesticate plants and develop agriculture. They were also the first to develop Iron working. Most of the prehistoric whites were black like tutsis, some of these blacks that were the precursor to whites still have caucosoid features. The whites were the result of Indo-Aryans, Middle Easterners, & these Africans moving in-between various landmasses, and also pushing each other out.
Separating ourselves from white people and other races and concentrating on US is what is going to change things for Blacks. Whenever we are away from white people we excel and prosper…. Study the black/Negro wall street in the early 1920′s we had numerous successful black business until white people (yet again) came and ruined things like they always do…..
The truth is white people have always ruined things for black people and will continue to ruin things for us until they’re extinct wether it’s calling us derogatory names , enslaving us , lynching us pushing drugs in our communities sticking us in ghettos, not employing us pushing interracial union and negatives stereotypes in the media and much much more and you wonder why we call white people devils.
For more information on why whites are more evil then blacks….
http://yeyeolade.wordpress.com/2007/04/06/blackamerikkkawake-up/
LoStranger,
If there was any truth to your argument, then how do you explain the wanton and indiscriminate rape and murder of women and children in the eastern part of the African Congo? This is not being done by white men. It’s being done by the Hutu rebels driven out of Rwanda in 1994 who are now locked in a 17 year war with the Congolese army, in which over 5.4 MILLION people have been killed so far.
The only other war in history to have more casualties is World War II. Therefore what you are saying is nothing short of ideological quackery.
Xen
Again you agree with me: ‘daily reminder that their skin color puts them at a genetic disadvantage in a world run by people of a fairer complexion. ” There is a reason for this, the survival of the fittest who happens to be of a fairer complexion, it is no the other way around. Who conquered who and why?, who has made more contributions to society? I am not talking about “tambores” and jumping in the NBA, and talking about the real deal, real science, aviation, Math, etc…
In crisis who suffers the most and why?, We have been collecting data for a century, same rights to attend schools and nothing, it is time to draw a conclusion.
There have been black inventors and innovators before in the U.S. You can search them up on the internet. The only reason why people of a fairer complexion run the world is because by sheer concidence, luck, and circumstances they managed to stay out of geographical disadvantages, and also be at locations and times when they were able to maximize and fully take advantage of any innovation that grew and the latest trade (Silk road, Italy).